Life News Report. 092819. Democrats Running for President Support Abortion and Infanticide. But They Don’t Support Babies

Click on the image to see the text. Click on the arrow to see the video.
Baby Swimming – Babies love swimming underwater.
74,714,853 views•Sep 8, 2017.
ditto art. 1.04M subscribers.
This is a collection of funny videos baby swim. Watch the action funny cute babies.

The video shows babies being loved.

If it is okay to kill a baby, up to the time of birth, is it okay to kill a baby five minutes after birth, or ten minutes after birth, or thirty minutes after birth, or one hour after birth, or one day after birth, or one week after birth, or one month after birth, or one year after birth?

I have heard of people saying that a mother can take “Little Johnny” home from the hospital after being born, for a week, and then return “Little Johnny” to the hospital for the hospital staff, to complete the abortion of “Little Johnny.”

Democrats Running for President Support Abortion and Infanticide. But They Don’t Support Babies

Democrats Running for President Support Abortion and Infanticide. But They Don’t Support Babies

OPINION. CAROL TOBIAS. SEP 18, 2019. 6:58 PM. WASHINGTON, DC

Thanks to social media and out-of-the-mainstream media outlets, we hear more about what’s happening with candidates as they campaign across the country. But the irony is, no longer are Democrats trying to cover their genuinely radical anti-life positions. Quite frankly, whereas pro-abortion Democrats used to wrap their advocacy in (meaningless) qualifications, I’m amazed at how forthcoming this crop of presidential candidates is about their position on abortion.

Other than Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), who now says she would support some limits on third-trimester abortions, the other candidates support unlimited abortion on demand (for any reason) throughout pregnancy. Some have even voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act which would offer protection to babies who survive an attempted abortion.

What have some the candidates said?

Former Congressman Beto O’Rourke, campaigning at a college in South Carolina, was asked, “Someone asked you specifically—specifically– about third-trimester abortions and you said, ‘That’s a decision left up to the mother’ so my question is this, I was born September 8, 1989, and I want to know if you think, on September 7, 1989, my life had no value.”

O’Rourke responded, “Of course I don’t think that and of course I’m glad that you’re here. But you referenced my answer in Ohio and it remains the same. This is a decision that neither you, nor I, nor the United States government should be making. That’s a decision for the woman to make.”

CNN recently held a seven-hour-long marathon town hall, giving each of the top ten candidates an opportunity to talk about climate change. Sen. Bernie Sanders (Independent-Vt.) was asked if he would discuss population control and would he make it a key feature of a plan to address “climate catastrophe.”

Sanders responded, “Well, Martha, the answer is yes. And the answer has everything to do with the fact that women in the United States of America, by the way, have a right to control their own bodies and make reproductive decisions.

“And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that are — that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control, to me is totally absurd. So I think, especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies, and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, it’s something I very, very strongly support.”

LifeNews depends on the support of readers like you to combat the pro-abortion media. Please donate now.

So, Beto O’Rourke can look a college student in the face and tell him that his mother had the right to kill him the day before he was born. Bernie Sanders can look into the camera and say, in the context of population control, that the lives of unborn babies of women in third-world countries may have to be sacrificed so the rest of the world can sleep peacefully at night. (Please note my heavy sarcasm here!)

Julian Castro, former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development in the Obama administration, was more “inclusive,” as one reporter described it. “I believe in reproductive justice, and what that means is just because a woman — or, let’s not forget someone in the trans community, a trans female…” This is the same man who has called for an end to euthanizing dogs and cats in animal shelters.

Apparently, the life of a dog or cat is more valuable to him than a preborn human being.

Back in May, in a town hall meeting, Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) offered a proposal that “would give the Department of Justice final say over abortion laws passed by states or localities that have enacted unconstitutional abortion restrictions in the past 25 years,” according to the Los Angeles Times. The idea is so preposterous, only the most hard-core pro-abortionists could applaud it with a straight face.

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is calling on Congress to repeal the Hyde amendment so that federal dollars may be used to pay for hundreds of thousands of abortions, and to pass federal laws to preempt state legislation so that our state affiliates, working with legislators, are not able to pass legislation to protect unborn children.

Sens. Harris, Warren, and Sanders, along with senators and fellow presidential candidates Amy Klobuchar (D-Mn) and Cory Booker (D-NJ), have all co-sponsored the “Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance Act.” The bill would repeal the Hyde Amendment and would allow health plans funded by public programs to cover abortions. It would also prevent state and local governments from limiting insurance coverage of abortion by private health care plans.

In previous election cycles, pro-lifers often had to search very thoroughly in order to find out how rabidly pro-abortion some candidates were because they tried to hide their true position. We see that no more.

The candidates now are at least being honest. They proudly wear their fanatical anti-life positions on their sleeves and almost shout it from the rooftops.

We just need to make sure that America is listening.

LifeNews Note: Carol Tobias is the president of the National Right to Life Committee.

Please follow this site.

Advertisements

Life News Report. 01.23.19. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo Signs Bill Legalizing Abortions Up to Birth

How to Swaddle a Baby / Swaddle a Newborn Baby 3 Easy Ways
3,705,760 views•Oct 21, 2017. travelwithnicole. 7.95K subscribers. A nurse’s step-by-step guide to swaddling a baby 3 different ways. Swaddling wrapping will help your baby feel safe, secure, and cozy. It may even soothe a cranky or colic baby and help baby stop crying. We learned these swaddles in the hospital on day one from the 3 different hospital nurses we had. Each nurse taught us a different way to swaddle. * Make sure you leave enough place for legs to move around. Swaddling too tightly may cause hip dysplasia. More information about this and how to swaddle at my blog. My blog can be seen at http://www.nicolepano.com

As you read the following Life News Report, consider a ten pound newborn baby being killed at, or after, birth.

Life News Report. 01.23.19.

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo Signs Bill Legalizing Abortions Up to Birth

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo Signs Bill Legalizing Abortions Up to Birth.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo wasted no time signing a radical pro-abortion bill into law Tuesday.

Just hours after the state Senate and Assembly passed it, Cuomo signed the bill, legalizing abortion for basically any reason up to birth in New York state, Rochester City Newspaper reports.

The pro-abortion governor gave Sarah Weddington, the attorney in the Roe v. Wade case, a special seat next to him Tuesday evening, as abortion activists around them cheered, the AP reports.

Cuomo said he hopes other states will follow in New York’s footsteps and pass similar pro-abortion laws.

“With the signing of this bill, we are sending a clear message that whatever happens in Washington, women in New York will always have the fundamental right to control their own body,” Cuomo said in a statement.

The so-called Reproductive Health Act goes beyond Roe v. Wade, allowing unborn babies to be aborted even when the U.S. Supreme Court has said states may restrict abortions. Late-term abortions, which currently are illegal in New York, would be allowed, and non-doctors would be allowed to perform them.

SIGN THE PETITION: Excommunicate Andrew Cuomo for Legalizing Abortions Up to Birth

New York pro-lifers fought successfully for more than a decade to defeat the radical pro-abortion bill. But the November election put pro-abortion Democrats in control of both state houses, and the politicians made abortion on demand a priority for the new year.

New York State Right to Life mourned what the new law will mean for babies and mothers, but promised to continue fighting to protect them.

“RHA is an extreme bill sold to the public saying it merely ‘updates’ New York’s law, which is far from true,” the pro-life organization said in a statement. “RHA will expand abortion past 24 weeks through birth, make abortion a ‘fundamental right,’ and prohibit all limits, which Roe vs. Wade did not do.

“[We] will continue to work to expose the misinformation put forth about RHA, protect children and their mothers, protect the rights of pro-life persons to engage in life-saving activities and express their views, and to build a culture of Life in New York,” the group continued.

The law appears to restrict late-term abortions, but it adds a broad “health” exception for abortions after 24 weeks. The exception would allow women to abort unborn babies up to nine months of pregnancy for basically any reason, including “age, economic, social and emotional factors,” according to New York Right to Life.

It also redefines a “person” as “a human being who has been born and is alive,” and describes abortion as a “fundamental right.”

The legislation poses serious dangers to women’s lives and rights as well. By removing protections from illegal abortions, the law will open the door for abuses. According to New York RTL, back alley abortionists, abusive partners or parents and others no longer will face charges for illegally killing an unborn baby – even if the mother wants her child.

“In early December, a resident of Saratoga County was arrested for punching the stomach of a woman who was 26 weeks pregnant in an attempt to cause a miscarriage. The man was charged with abortion in the second degree, but under the RHA, the attacker would not have been charged with a felony,” according to the Catholic News Service.

Protections for babies born alive after botched abortions also would end under the new bill. Additionally, the bill says the state cannot “deny, regulate or restrict” abortion, not even for common-sense reasons such as parental consent for minors, informed consent or limits on taxpayer-funded abortions.

New York State Right to Life predicted that the bill will lead to the suppression of pro-lifers’ freedom of speech and conscience as well. Doctors and nurses who refuse to help abort unborn babies could lose their jobs, and pro-life advocates could be persecuted for just speaking out for life.

Already one of the most pro-abortion states in America, New York would become even more pro-abortion if the law passes. In 2016, 82,189 unborn babies were aborted in New York, with about half being taxpayer-funded, according to the local news. Of those babies, 1,763 were at least 20 weeks, meaning they may have been viable outside the womb.

Meanwhile, a new poll indicates this radical pro-abortion legislation is not what Americans want. According to a national poll conducted by Marist University, three in four Americans (75 percent) say abortion should be limited to – at most – the first three months of pregnancy. This includes most of those who identify as Republicans (92 percent), Independents (78 percent) and a majority of Democrats (60 percent). It also includes more than six in 10 (61 percent) who identify as “pro-choice” on abortion.

The Marist Poll follows on the heels of a May 2018 Gallup poll which found that 53 percent of Americans oppose all or most abortions.

Please follow this site.

Life News Report. 8.30.19. Pete Buttigieg Hopes 2,246 Aborted Babies Won’t Stop Abortions: “Women Need” to Kill Their Babies

Click on the image to see the text. Click on the arrow to see the video.
#funnybaby #cutebaby #AFV Funny Twins, Triple and Quadruplets Baby Moments 506,483 views•Aug 30, 2019
(Video details at bottom)

Pete Buttigieg Hopes 2,246 Aborted Babies Won’t Stop Abortions: “Women Need” to Kill Their Babies


Pete Buttigieg Hopes 2,246 Aborted Babies Won’t Stop Abortions: “Women Need” to Kill Their Babies
NATIONAL STEVEN ERTELT SEP 19, 2019 | 8:10AM WASHINGTON, DC

Democrat presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg finally spoke out about the abortionist from his hometown who hoarded 2,246 aborted babies and kept them as trophies. He said he hoped the shocking discovery of the 2,246 human souvenirs would not stop women from getting abortions, which kill unborn babies, that they supposedly need.

Attorneys General in the states of Illinois and Indiana say they will investigate the gruesome discovery of over 2,200 preserved aborted babies found in the home of abortionist Ulrich Klopfer after he died earlier this month.

Police say 2,246 medically preserved remains of aborted babies were found on the property of Klopfer’s home. Klopfer died on September 3rd and, on September 12, the Will County (Illinois) Coroner’s Office received a call from an attorney representing his family. They reported finding fetal remains among Klopfer’s personal property and requested proper removal. And there may be more stored aborted babies unaccounted for at his old abortion business.

As abortion activists are prone to do, Buttigieg finally responded to the days-old news and cavalierly referred to the destruction of human life as “health care.”

“Like everyone, I find the news out of Illinois extremely disturbing, and I think it’s important that it be fully investigated,” Buttigieg said on Wednesday. “I also hope it doesn’t get caught up in politics at a time when women need access to healthcare. There’s no question that what happened is disturbing. It’s unacceptable. And it needs to be looked into fully.”

Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

Buttigieg was a strong opponent of a pro-life pregnancy center that provided alternatives to the Klopfer abortion center and he supported Klopfer’s main assistant in opening her own abortion business.

Will County sheriff’s detectives, crime scene investigators and representatives from the coroner’s office went to the address and were directed to an area of the property where 2,246 medically preserved aborted children were located. The coroner’s office took possession of the remains.

Indiana legislators sought an investigation to determine what happened and whether the aborted babies were illegally transported across state lines from Klopfer’s Indiana-based abortion facility to his Illinois home.

“State Rep. Ron Bacon and three fellow Republican lawmakers issued a statement Sunday saying the Indiana attorney general’s office should investigate the abortion clinics in Allen, Lake and St. Joseph’s counties where Dr. Ulrich Klopfer worked,” AP reported. “The attorney general’s office hasn’t responded to a request for comment Monday.”

“The revelation of over 2,200 fetal remains being found on the property of the late Dr. Klopfer in Illinois is seriously disturbing,” State Rep. Ron Bacon, R-Chandler, said in a news release. “Since these remains were found in Illinois, we are very concerned there may be other remains in the Indiana clinics where he performed abortions.”

SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you like this pro-life article, please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

Now, the attorneys general of Illinois and Indiana say they will launch a probe.

Indiana’s attorney general said Monday that he will work with his Illinois counterpart to investigate what he called the “grisly discovery” of more than 2,000 medically preserved fetal remains at the Illinois home of a late doctor who performed abortions in Indiana.

Republican Attorney General Curtis Hill said he and Democratic Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul have “agreed to work together” as Hill’s office coordinates an investigation of the remains found at the home of Dr. Ulrich Klopfer, who died Sept. 3.

“The grisly discovery of these fetal remains at the Illinois home of a deceased abortion doctor shocks the conscience. Further, we have reason to believe there is an Indiana connection to these remains,” he said in a statement.

Hill’s statement did not elaborate on what specifically would be investigated. Raoul’s office said it has agreed to assist Hill with contacting authorities in Illinois.

Judd Deere, a White House spokesman, issued a statement Monday evening decrying the situation and calling for a full investigation to determine if anyone else was involved and whether crimes were committed.

Republican Gov. Eric Holcomb issued a statement saying he was “deeply disturbed” by the discovery of the fetal remains and that he supports “calls for a federal investigation.” His statement followed Republican U.S. Rep. Jackie Walorski’s request Saturday that state and federal authorities “conduct a full investigation into this case and take any steps necessary to protect Hoosiers, including the unborn, from unsafe practitioners.”

Indiana law requires burial or cremation of babies killed in abortions — a law the Supreme Court has upheld.

Indiana Right to Life president Mike Fichter also wants an investigation.

He told LifeNews: “We are horrified by the reports of over 2,000 fetal remains being found on the property of Dr. Ulrich Klopfer, a man who operated abortion facilities in Gary, South Bend and Fort Wayne. These sickening reports underscore why the abortion industry must be held to the highest scrutiny. We are calling on Indiana authorities to join in the investigation to determine if these fetal remains have any connection to abortion operations, or personnel, in Indiana.”

Steve Aden, an attorney who is president of Americans United for Life, beleives Klopfer’s actions violated state law.

“Klopfer’s actions undoubtedly violated Indiana medical waste laws, but he didn’t care. Nor did he care that thousands of his patients did not giv consent to allowing him to take the bodies of their deceased infants across state lines for an unknown reason. Was it for the purpose of personal, bizarre experimentation? Something else?” he asked. “He was effectively running an unlicensed cemetery.”

“We’re all aware (or should be) of the horrors committed by abortionist Kermit Gosnell at his clinic in Philadelphia. But Gosnell wasn’t the beginning of the terrible story of abortion in America, and Ulrich Klopfer won’t be the end of it,” he said.

This isn’t the first time Klopfer was found to have stored the remains of aborted babies. Police executed a search warrant on Ulrich G. Klopfer’s Women’s Pavilion abortion clinic in South Bend, Indiana, seizing documents and other property on Wednesday, on March 19, 2014.

Police from the St. Joseph County Special Victims Unit participated in the raid. It is unknown exactly what kind of documents or other evidence the search warrant allowed police to take. According to news reports, the police apparently made copies of the seized documents and returned the originals to Klopfer.

The raid came after inspections of his abortion center in 2010 and 2012 found him storing the remains of an aborted baby in the fridge next to medications.

When he was doing abortions, the Indiana Medical Licensing Board called on the Indiana Attorney General’s office to investigate allegations that Dr. Ulrich Klopfer, operator of three Indiana abortion clinics, was running afoul of state laws. Klopfer failed to report a statutory rape as required by Indiana law. He eventually lost his license as a result.

Klopfer, an Illinois resident, operated abortion facilities for decades in Gary, Fort Wayne and South Bend. Klopfer lost his Fort Wayne back-up physician with admitting privileges, required by an Allen County ordinance and state code, in December 2013, rendering him unable to do abortions in Fort Wayne in 2014 and 2015.

“Years of shoddy abortion practices have finally caught up with Dr. Klopfer,” said Cathie Humbarger, Indiana Right to Life’s Vice President of Policy Enforcement, said at the time. “Klopfer compromised the health and safety of women who sought abortions from him in Gary, Fort Wayne and South Bend, and we’re relieved he is finally being shut down. Hoosier women deserve better. We extend our appreciation to the Pence administration and the ISDH for refusing to sweep Klopfer’s shady practices under the rug. It’s a good day for the health and safety of Hoosier women.”

Please follow this blog

Video Details.

2.5K Daddy Cool 187K subscribers. Funny Twins, Triple and Quadruplets Baby Moments.
Welcome to Daddy Cool Channel ! Have a nice time watching our content. Our channel shares the content of hilarious videos compilation in our lives do. New episode will be released each weeks. Follow and subscribe to Daddy Cool Channel for not missing any. Our content build in this channel is owned by VIN DI BONA PRODUCTIONS. Thanks!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
►►►►►►►►► THANKS FOR WATCHING ◄◄◄◄◄◄◄◄◄
► AND DON’T FORGET TO LIKE COMMENTS AND SUBSCRIBE!
If there are any copyright issues with any videos posted here i will remove them. please contact my email : info@futurena.net
Thank for watching and support

Here’s Why Democrats Refuse to Take a Stance Against Infanticide

Click on the image to see the text. Click on the arrow to see the video.

Abortion Survivor Meets Her Birth Mother. 1,231,596 views•Jan 26, 2017. EWTN. 241K subscribers.

Melissa Ohden survived an abortion attempt and learned about it at age 14. In an interview with EWTN Pro-Life Weekly’s Catherine Szeltner, Melissa opens up about her life in a new way, including what it was like to meet her birth mother.

Here’s Why Democrats Refuse to Take a Stance Against Infanticide


Here’s Why Democrats Refuse to Take a Stance Against Infanticide

A New York Times bestseller is shedding additional light on the bizarre refusal of Democratic public officials to combat infanticide.

Radicals, Resistance, and Revenge by cable news commentator Judge Jeanine Pirro devotes an entire chapter to what she describes as “The Radicals’ Attack on Life Itself.”

Calling the legalization of infanticide “the worst cultural shift our country has ever witnessed,” Pirro discusses in-depth the killing of full-term babies following “botched” abortions.

Pirro’s writing is significant for a number of reasons. For one, she has a large audience, so her words carry a great deal of weight. For another, she previously ran as a “pro-choice” candidate, so her decision to zero in on a culture of life issue is intriguing.

Pirro revives discussion of a Virginia bill—eventually defeated in subcommittee—which would have permitted abortions during the process of a mother’s labor. She recalls the haunting words of Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, who, when asked about the bill, coldly stated:

“If a mother’s in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physician and the mother.”

Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures and videos.

A “discussion”? What about critical health care for the baby? The Governor’s chilling words show how far the pro-abortion agenda has gone—to the point of unapologetic infanticide. (Pirro points out that the Governor pocketed nearly two million dollars from the political arm of the nation’s largest abortion operation, Planned Parenthood).

As Pirro notes, “I’ve prosecuted infanticide cases in my home state of New York where infants are killed intentionally. It’s a homicide, folks, not an abortion. It’s about the child’s death and not the mother’s reproductive health.”

Pirro also brings up the alarming undercover videos taken by the Center for Medical Progress showing Planned Parenthood officials blithely discussing the harvesting of baby body parts and what they would cost the (pretend) purchaser. The author writes, “what we saw on those videos was an accurate depiction of what was going on inside Planned Parenthood.”

The march of states such as New York toward infanticide (its 2019 “Reproductive Health Act” repealed protection for born-alive infants who survive an abortion attempt) shows how the extreme nature of the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court ruling known as Roe v. Wade has made the unthinkable common place. “Fourth trimester” abortions becoming a reality.

This is why it is not enough for us to simply work valiantly to reduce abortions. For the sake of our society and our posterity, Roe must go.

LifeNews.com Note: Maria Gallagher is the Legislative Director and Political Action Committee Director for the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation and she has written and reported for various broadcast and print media outlets, including National Public Radio, CBS Radio, and AP Radio.

Please follow this site.

Nancy Pelosi Has Time to Trash Trump at Pro-Abortion Event, No Time to Vote to End Infanticide

Dad with His Newborn Presenting Baby To Mom. 630,402 views•Feb 20, 2013. Memorial Hermann. 14.8K subscribers

http://womens.memorialhermann.org/
As the c-section come to a close dad can finally present their new baby to mom and enjoy their newborn.

Nancy Pelosi Has Time to Trash Trump at Pro-Abortion Event, No Time to Vote to End Infanticide

Government data proves that newborn babies are dying every year after surviving abortions in the United States.

Yet, Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi continues to refuse to protect them. In the past year, she has blocked a vote on the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act a full 80 times. The bill would require that basic medical care be provided to infants who survive abortions.

On Thursday, Pelosi made it clear what her priorities are when she took time out of her busy schedule to speak at the 50th anniversary celebration for NARAL, a radical pro-abortion group that supports elective abortions up to birth and taxpayer funding for them.

According to the Huffington Post, Pelosi described the current political climate as a “very sad time for our country.” She slammed President Donald Trump, who has taken strong steps to protect the rights of both unborn and born Americans.

“I say this to you with great sorrow and prayerfully, that we are at a place that I hoped we would never be,” the California congresswoman said.

SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you like this pro-life article, please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

“We never thought we would see a president take the actions that he has. In fact, I don’t think our Founders ever thought a president would do such a thing,” Pelosi continued.

She also claimed public support is on the side of pro-abortion activists.

“We have won in the court of public opinion, and now we must continue to win in the court of law,” Pelosi said.

But nothing could be further from the truth. Polling shows Americans — including people who are “pro-choice” on abortion — oppose abortions up to birth and infanticide. And both abortionists and women admit that they abort healthy, viable unborn babies for purely elective reasons.

Trump has spoken out repeatedly against the cruel injustice of infanticide and pro-abortion Democrats’ continued attempts to ignore the problem.

“Senate Democrats just voted against legislation to prevent the killing of newborn infant children. The Democrat position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth,” he wrote in February. “This will be remembered as one of the most shocking votes in the history of Congress. If there is one thing we should all agree on, it’s protecting the lives of innocent babies.”

H.R. 962, the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, introduced by U.S. Rep. Ann Wagner, of Missouri, ensures that a baby born alive after a failed or attempted abortion receives the same medical care as any other newborn born at that stage of pregnancy. It would penalize doctors who allow infants to die or who intentionally kill a newborn following a failed abortion.

So far, 201 House members have signed on to the bill, including three Democrats — short of the majority necessary to get the bill to the floor for a vote.

Data from just three states indicates that 40 babies were born alive after botched abortions between 2016 and 2018. According to reports from their state health departments, 11 babies were born alive after abortions in Minnesota, 10 in Arizona and 19 in Florida.

Statistics from the Centers for Disease Control, as well as the personal testimonies of nurses and abortion survivors themselves, also provide evidence that babies survive abortions. According to the CDC, at least 143 babies were born alive after abortions between 2003 and 2014 in the U.S., though there likely are more. Many state health departments do not track the number of abortion survivors.

Research by the American Center for Law and Justice estimated the number is much higher, at least 362 between 2001 and 2010.

The problem is very real. Newborn babies are being neglected and dying all across America. And the abortion industry, which profits from their deaths, needs to be held accountable. This is not an issue of women’s bodies. It is a matter of basic human rights for newborn children.

But Pelosi enjoys her political power, in part, because of the abortion industry’s support. So, it’s no surprise that she continues to ignore the plight of vulnerable newborn babies.

Please follow this site.

Hillary Clinton Wins Pro-Abortion “Lifetime Achievement” Award, Calls Killing Babies a Human Right

3,262,494 views•Jul 10, 2012. lortolfyn. 3.59K subscribers. 3weeks old – Baby Yoga Time, Newborn Baby Ella stretching

Hillary Clinton Wins Pro-Abortion “Lifetime Achievement” Award, Calls Killing Babies a Human Right

The pro-abortion group NARAL celebrated its 50th anniversary Thursday by giving failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton its Lifetime Achievement Award.

In between criticisms of President Donald Trump, leaders of the radical pro-abortion group called Clinton “our president” and touted her pro-abortion record. NARAL held its 50th anniversary celebration Thursday in Washington, D.C.

“Women’s rights are human rights, and for 50 years NARAL has taken on the toughest fights to protect our most fundamental freedoms. Happy anniversary. Let’s keep going,” Clinton wrote on Twitter after accepting the award.

During her acceptance speech, Clinton spent a lot of time criticizing Trump, who has taken strong steps to protect human rights for both the born and unborn. Among his many actions, the president cut taxpayer funding to abortion providers, urged countries to stand together against the United Nation’s abortion agenda, and defended the conscience protection rights of pro-life medical workers.

In contrast, Clinton, who lost to Trump in 2016, campaigned on supporting third-trimester abortions and forcing taxpayers to fund them.

On Thursday, she slammed Trump as a “danger” to the future of America and urged Democrats in Congress to impeach him, according to Bloomberg.

“This current occupant of the Oval Office poses a clear and present danger to our future, to our democracy,” Clinton said. Trump “has betrayed his oath of office to uphold the Constitution and protect and defend our country.”

For her commitment to the cause of killing unborn babies, NARAL leader Ilyse Hogue praised Clinton and called her “our president.”

“She will always be my president,” Hogue said.

Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

Please follow this site.