The Great White Throne Judgment

Revelation 20:15: “And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.”

Click onto any blue letter, number or symbol to see the videos and text on the blog.

Our nation is being led by someone who exhibits no evidence that he has been born again of the Spirit of God. Two others of his party, who exhibit the same lack of spiritual indwelling, also want to lead our nation. A person who does not have the Spirit of God dwelling within them, lacks Spiritual knowledge. As a result, the decisions that are made by such a person are often made in total disrespect for, and opposition to, the teachings of our Lord and Savior, Jesus. As a result, our nation is being led in that same direction. We are quickly falling from the strength of the following scripture.

Psalm 33:12 Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB)

12 Happy is the nation whose God is Yahweh…

Consider the following two scriptures that relate to such a person who has no spiritual wisdom.

1 Corinthians 1:18 Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB)

(Christ the Power and Wisdom of God – Those who are not born again lack Godly wisdom)

18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but it is God’s power to us who are being saved.

1 Corinthians 2:14 Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB)

(Those of whom are not born again, do not understand Godly spiritual matters)

14 But the unbeliever does not welcome what comes from God’s Spirit, because it is foolishness to him; he is not able to understand it since it is evaluated spiritually.

Consider “The Lady Of The Left”

Hillary Clinton on Abortion: “The Unborn Person Doesn’t Have Constitutional Rights”

In a new interview today, pro-abortion presidential candidate Hillary Clinton couldn’t have made her radical abortion views more clear. Clinton said unborn children simply do not have any Constitutional rights, which would include the right to life.

“The unborn person doesn’t have constitutional rights,” Clinton said, adding that “the woman’s right to make decisions” is the be all and end all when it comes to abortion.

Weekly Standard writer Shosanna Weissman was surprised that Clinton used the term “person” since most abortion advocates never refer to unborn children with any reference to their humanity.

Most notable perhaps is Clinton’s use of “person.” Oftentimes, when talking about a woman’s right to choose, pro-choicers will use terminology that suggests the unborn is not a person or human, but a “fetus.”

Hillary Clinton: I Would Not Appoint Someone to the Supreme Court Who Didn’t Support Abortion
On the presidential campaign trail, Hillary Clinton is making it abundantly clear. She will not name any nominees to the Supreme Court who do not support abortion on demand.

Click to Read at

Hillary Clinton: I Would Not Appoint Someone to the Supreme Court Who Didn’t Support Abortion

On the presidential campaign trail, Hillary Clinton is making it abundantly clear. She will not name any nominees to the Supreme Court who do not support abortion on demand.

Asked about President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace pro-life Justice Antonin Scalia, Clinton said she would not second guess Obama’s nomination and added that any nomination she would make if elected would be a hardcore abortion activists who supports Roe v. Wade, which has ushered in an era of 58 million abortions.

From the Washington Times:

Clinton said she wouldn’t second-guess Mr. Obama’s decision to pick Judge Garland to fill the seat left vacant by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, but added that if she were in the Oval Office she would search for nominees in the mold of Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Mrs. Clinton said Justice Sotomayor’s Hispanic heritage and underprivileged upbringing brought needed perspectives to the high court.

Clinton also said she would impose litmus tests on abortion and campaign finance. Her nominees, she said, would have to prove that they would uphold the Roe v. Wade decision establishing a national right to abortion and would have to show that they would overturn the Citizens United decision that established free speech campaign rights for interest groups.

“I would not appoint someone who didn’t think Roe v. Wade is settled law,” Mrs. Clinton said while campaigning in Madison, Wisconsin, where the next primary is slated for next week.

After Merrick’s nomination, Clinton immediately came out in favor of his nomination and demanded the Senate vote on him. In a post on Clinton’s web site, a Hillary campaign staffer expanded on the reasons for her supporting Garland — saying “legal abortion is at take.”

President Obama has nominated Judge Merrick Garland to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by the sudden death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

Within minutes of the president’s announcement, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pledged to deny this qualified, widely respected jurist a hearing or a vote.

It’s yet another reminder of what’s at stake in this election. As we wait to see whether Republicans in the U.S. Senate will do their jobs and fulfill their constitutional responsibility, keep one thing in mind:

The next president will likely have the opportunity to nominate several justices to the Supreme Court. And in doing so, she or he could have the power to transform the court—and American law—for generations to come.

Here’s what is at stake:

1. Safe and legal abortion

The Supreme Court recently held oral arguments from an abortion case from Texas—and the state’s access to safe and legal abortion hangs in the balance. Every leading Republican presidential candidate opposes abortion, and some even oppose exceptions for rape, incest, or to protect a woman’s health. And many would overturn Roe v. Wade to make that happen.

Clinton’s support for Garland’s nomination based on abortion coincides with Planned Parenthood’s support. After Obama nominated Garland, the CEO of the Planned Parenthood abortion business was spotted entering the White House.

The abortion corporation praised Garland and demanded the Senate hold a vote on is nomination.

On Facebook, Planned Parenthood praise Garland, saying, “Here’s what you need to know about President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Merrick Garland: He’s an intelligent, highly accomplished judge with a record of bipartisan support. There is no reason for the Senate GOP leadership to obstruct justice and refuse to give Judge Garland a fair hearing.”

Top pro-life groups told that nothing has changed since Scalia’s passing in terms of their opposition to a vote on any Obama Supreme Court nominee. They say anyone Obama nominates for the Supreme Court will vote to uphold abortion on demand, ergo they will oppose a vote on Garland’s nomination.

Leading pro-life advocates agree the Senate should not vote on Scalia’s replacement until after a new president has been selected.

Garland has praised the author of Roe v. Wade and said his court paper are “the greatest gift to the country.” New information has surfaced showing that his former clerks have gone on to serve liberal judges by a 3-1 margin.

Serious Thoughts

Never let anyone come between you and Jesus. Don’t let the ungodly leader of our nation, or the ungodly party that makes excuses for him and the other ungodly office holders and supporters of his party, to include the two people of that party who want to continue in the ungodly footsteps of our ungodly leader, “come between you and Jesus.” Don’t let the ungodly liberal religious denominations, who support our ungodly leader, and who are easily identified by their outward support for the killing of innocent unborn babies, and who support the abomination of homosexual marriage, “stray you from saving faith in Jesus.” Don’t let the ungodly unions and entertainment industry, and those of ungodly academia, “come between you and saving faith in Jesus.” Don’t let the ungodly educational establishment keep you from having, and freely expressing, saving faith in Jesus. The Words of God are very clear, as they relate to those who do not have an undeniable faith in Jesus. Don’t let saving faith in Jesus be altered by our nation’s ungodly leader, or by those who support him and his ungodly actions. Consider whether you are in the camp of the Godly, or of the ungodly. “Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.” (Matthew 7:13-14). The road of the ungodly leads to the Great White Throne Judgment, as is written in Revelation 20:15: “And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.”… Entering through the narrow gate excludes those who have a life of supporting those who support the killing of innocent unborn little babies. Entering through the narrow gate excludes those who support the abominable marriages of men to men and women to women. If you are one of those who support the killing of unborn babies, and who support homosexual marriage, there is no way that you have been born again and have the Spirit of God dwelling within your spirit, prompting you to live a life of righteousness. “Jesus answered him, Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he can not see the kingdom of God.” (John 3:3). For people who say that they vote for democrat candidates, and still believe that they have been born again, there is a major disconnect of values, which may end very tragically. The Great White Throne Judgment will not be swayed by our liberal and ungodly members of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Final Thought

Let’s say that a seven, eight, or nine pound baby is about to be delivered. Does anybody know of such a situation? It is not a choice; it’s a child! Our nation’s leader, the lady on the left, the elderly pro-choicer, and the DNC lady find no fault in destroying such a child. The Great White Throne Judgment awaits such people who have not been born again.

%d bloggers like this: