The relation of the Holy Spirit to the Tribulation. One of the important considerations accompanying a study of the tribulation period is the relation sustained by the Holy Spirit to that period and the work He will accomplish in it.
I. The Identity Of The Restrainer.
A. Much of the question of the Spirit’s relation to the tribulation is determined by the interpretation of 2 Thessalonians 2:7-8. It had been erroneously reported that the Thessalonians were already in the Day of the Lord (specifically, the Tribulation, which is the 70th week of Daniel’s prophecy). To correct this misinterpretation Paul states that they could not be in the Day of the Lord for that day could not come until the man of sin (anti-Christ) had been revealed. His manifestation was being prevented by a restraining work of one whose ministry was to remain. Only after the removal of this restrainer could the man of sin be revealed and the Day of the Lord begin. Chafer writes:
“The central truth of the passage under discussion is that, though Satan would
long ago have consummated his evil program for his cosmos world, and have
brought forward its last human ruler, there is a Restrainer who restrains to the end that Satan’s program shall be developed and completed only at God’s appointed time.”
B. John bears testimony that this program of introducing the man of sin had already begun to operate in his day (1 John 4:3). That Satanic program has continued through the age, but has been kept in check by the restrainer.
C. Who is the Restrainer? A number of answers have been given as to the identity of this restraining agency.
(1) Some have held that the restrainer was the Roman Empire under which Paul lived. The oldest and best interpretation is that Paul hesitated to set down in words what he meant, because he had in mind the Roman Empire. The impersonal influence was the magnificent system of law and justice throughout the Roman world; this held lawlessness and the Man of Lawlessness in check. Then the line of emperors, in spite of wicked individuals, had the same influence.
(2) A second view is that the restrainer was human government and law, as follows: In due time the Babylonian Empire, to whose king the words were spoken, was succeeded by the Persian, that by the Grecian, and that again by the Roman, which flourished in the Apostle’s day. The laws under which these states maintain their existence were inherited from Rome as Rome inherited them from the Empires that preceded her. Thus the existing authorities are ordained of God, constituted authority is intended to act in restraint of lawlessness.
(3) A third view is the view that Satan is the restrainer.
(a) One advocate of this view writes: Why should every one conclude that this hinderer must be some good thing? May not this restraining power be Satan himself? Has he not a plan for the manifesting of the Son of Perdition, as truly as God had a time appointed for the incarnation of His divine Son?
(b) The obvious answer to this allegation would be the reply of the Lord to those who accuse Him of working His signs by Satanic power: “If a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand” (Mark 3:25). Further, the removal of this restrainer does not free the world from Satanic activity, as would be the case if Satan were the restrainer, but thrusts him into the world with unleashed fury (Rev. 12:12). Walvoord says:
“This idea is hardly compatible with the revelation of Satan in the Scriptures.
Satan is nowhere given universal power over the world, though his influence is
inestimable. A study of 2 Thessalonians 2:3-10 indicates that the one who restrains is removed from the scene before the man of sin is revealed. This could hardly be said of Satan. The period of tribulation on the contrary is one in which Satan’s work is most evident. The Scriptures represent him as being cast into the earth and venting his fury during those tragic days (Rev. 12:9). The theory that Satan is the great restrainer of lawlessness is, accordingly, untenable.”
(4) A fourth interpretation is the view that the restrainer is the church. It is
recognized that believers were likened to salt, which is a preservative, and to light, which is a purifying agent, a dispeller of darkness. It would be agreed that the church could be one of the means through which restraint is felt but that which is the channel could not at the same time be the agent. It has been said:
“The church is at best an imperfect organism, perfect in standing before God,
to be sure, but experimentally before men, not always blameless or above
reproach. Like human government, the church is used of God to hinder the full
manifestation of the Evil One in this present age, but He who effectively restrains is not the believer, but the One who empowers the believer, the indwelling Holy Spirit (John 16:7; 1 Cor. 6:19). Apart from His presence, neither church nor government would have ability to hinder the program and power of Satan.
(5) The fifth interpretation is the interpretation that holds the restrainer is the Holy Spirit. Consider the following points to support this conclusion:
(a) By mere elimination, the Holy Spirit must be the restrainer. All other
suggestions fall far short of meeting the requirements.
(b) The Wicked One is a personality, and his operations include the realm of
the spiritual. The restrainer must likewise be a personality and a spiritual being, to hold Antichrist in check until the time for his revealing. Impersonal spiritual forces would be inadequate.
(c) To achieve all that is to be accomplished, the restrainer must be a member
of the Godhead. He must be stronger than the Man of Sin and stronger than Satan who energizes him. In order to restrain evil down through the course of the age, the restrainer must be eternal. The theater of sin is the entire world: therefore, it is imperative that the restrainer be one who is not limited by time or space.
(d) This age is in a particular sense the “dispensation of the Spirit,” for He
works in a way uncommon to other ages as an abiding Presence within the children of God. The church age commenced with the advent of the Spirit at Pentecost, and will close with a reversal of Pentecost, the removal of the Spirit. This does not mean that He will not be operative, only that He will no longer be resident.
(e) The work of the Spirit since His advent has included the restraint of evil;
John 16:7-11; 1 John 4:4. How different it will be in the tribulation?
(f ) Although the Spirit was not resident on earth during Old Testament days,
yet he exerted a restraining influence, per Isaiah 59:19b.
II. The work of the Holy Spirit to Believers in the Tribulation.
A. The fact that the Holy Spirit is the restrainer, to be removed from the earth before the tribulation period begins, must not be interpreted to mean that the Holy Spirit is no longer omnipresent, nor operative in the age. The Spirit will work in and through men. It is only insisted that the particular ministries of the Holy Spirit to the believer in this present age (baptism, 1 Cor. 12:12-13; indwelling, 1 Cor. 6:19, 20; sealing, Eph. 1:13; 4:30; and filling, Eph. 5:18) do terminate. On this question Walvoord writes:
“There is little evidence that believers will be indwelt by the Spirit during the
tribulation. The tribulation period seems to revert back to Old Testament
conditions in several ways; and in the Old Testament period, saints were never
permanently indwelt except in isolated instances, though a number of instances of the filling of the Spirit and of empowering for service are found. Taking all the factors into consideration, there is no evidence for the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit in believers in the tribulation. If believers are indwelt during the tribulation, however, it also would follow that they are sealed by the Spirit, the seal being His own presence in them.”
B. Since all of the Spirit’s ministries to the believer today depend upon His indwelling presence, the absence of this prevents all the dependent ministries to the tribulation saints.
III. Study References for this, and all of my articles, can be found in my Page, “About My References.”