I. Judges Will Be Raised Up In The Millennium. As the judges of the Old Testament were of divine appointment and were representatives through whom the theocratic kingdom was administered, so those who rule in the millennium will have the same characterization as judges, so that it may be evident that their authority is a demonstration of theocratic power.
A. Zechariah 3:7. “You shall also judge my house.”
B. Isaiah 1:26. And I will restore your judges as at the first, and your counsellors as at the beginning.”
II. Matthew 12:22-50 Overview.
A. This chapter chronicles direct attacks on Christ. The first was petty and foolish. It is on the question of the Sabbath. The Master gives to His people the true conception of the sanctity of the Sabbath. It is established, and remains, for “the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.” “How much is a man better than a sheep? Why, then, rescue a sheep and neglect a man?
B. The second attack was characterized by malicious hatred; it was an absolute denial of the sovereignty of God. Satan is cast out by Satan. The absolute folly of the position is revealed in the Lord’s reply. Only two forces are at work in the world, the gathering and the scattering. Whoever does the one, contradicts and hinders the other. Beelzebub (Satan) and the demons of whom he is prince are breaking up, destroying, scattering! Christ’s work is the opposite, “healing, saving, gathering.”
C. The third attack was a manifestation of contemptuous unbelief. “Master, we would see a sign from You.” Christ revealed the true reason for their unbelief, “an evil and adulterous generation.”
D. The last attack would be to Him the most bitter of them all. Mark gives us an insight into it that we miss in Matthew ( Mar 3:21-35 ). Jesus’ friends, even His mother, are so far out of sympathy with Him as to believe Him to be “mad,” and to desire to put Him under restraint. Of this, He makes occasion to declare the blessedness of the relation that the subjects of the Kingdom bear to Him. It has been wrongly imagined by some that the Lord’s language here shows disrespect for His mother, as though she had grieved Him. This is surely to miss the deepest truth in His statement. The relationship with Him, into which those come who do the will of His Father, is as dear as that of brother and sister and mother.
III. Jesus Rejected By The Pharisees. Matthew 12:22-50.
A. Pharisees Accuse Yeshua Of Healing By Demonic Power. 12:22-37.
1. Following the many miracles already recorded, an outstanding case of need was presented to the crowd in one whom was demon possessed and both blind and dumb. Such a pitiful person should have aroused the sympathy even of the Pharisees. When Messiah, with amazing power, healed him so that he could both speak and see, and by inference cast out the demon, it brought amazement to the people, and they said, “Is not this the son of David?” (v. 23).
2. The Pharisees countered by accusing Him of casting out demons by Beelzebub, the prince of demons. Beelzebub was actually a heathen deity, referred to earlier by Jesus in Matthew 10:25, and one supposedly in authority over the demons.
3. Christ answered the Pharisees by showing the illogic of their statement. He pointed out that this would be a kingdom divided against itself. It would be Satan casting out Satan. If the casting out of demons is by Beelzebub, then by whom did the Pharisees who were exorcists cast out demons? The point was that only the power of God or someone under the power of God could accomplish this.
4. Yeshua then drove home His point. If demons have been actually cast out, then it must have been by the Spirit of God, and then, in the person of Christ, the kingdom of God had come unto them. One could not enter the demonic realm victoriously unless he first had bound the strong man (v. 29). The Pharisees had to make a choice. They were either with Christ or against Him. But if they were against Him, they were guilty of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, a sin which by its nature is not forgiven (vv. 31-32).(See the next paragraph).
5. There has been much misunderstanding about blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. Here it is properly defined as attributing to Satan what is accomplished by the power of God. Such a sin is not unpardonable in itself, but rather because it rejects the person and work of the Holy Spirit, without whom repentance and restoration are impossible. As far as it applies today, it is not the thought that one seeking pardon will not find it, but rather that one who rejects the Holy Spirit will not seek pardon. It is the ultimate in unbelief. In verse 33, He points out that a good tree brings forth good fruit and a bad tree brings forth bad fruit. They must judge Him on the basis of His works. Committing a sin is not the basis for a committal into hell. The New Birth (Jn 3:3); through belief in Christ is the key to eternal life (Jn 3:16), as opposed to unbelief in Christ (Jn 3:18). We who have been born again, through belief in Christ, are assured that we can not be “unborn,” and therefore are secure in Christ (Jn 10: 27-30), having the Spirit of Christ dwelling within our born again spirits (Jn 14:7-12; 16-17, 20; 16:7-11; 20:30-31). Once we have been born again, dwelling in Christ, we are the righteousness of Christ (2 Cor 17); the righteousness of God in Christ (vs 21). (Ryrie Study Bible note: Charles C. Ryrie, Ph. D. “Blasphemy against the Spirit.” Technically, according to the scribes, blasphemy involved direct and explicit abuse of the reviling of God by attributing the Spirit’s work to Satan. The special circumstances involved in this blasphemy can not be duplicated today; therefore, this sin can not now be duplicated today; therefore, this sin can not now be committed. Yeshua exhorted the Pharisees to turn and be justified (vv 33, 37). My note: Consider people, even believers in Christ, whom have been told that they are guilty of having committed “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit,” and therefore are destined for hell, with no way of changing their eternity.
6. The unbelief of the Pharisees calls forth the strongest language. Christ addressed them, “generation of vipers,” or poisonous snakes. He declared that they were evil and therefore could not speak good and warned them that as unbelievers, every idle word they speak will be called to account on the day of judgment. He concluded in Matthew 12:37, “For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.” This was addressed to the unsaved Pharisees; not to Christians, “justified by faith and whose sins had been forgiven.” Believers in Christ will have a judgment of rewards after the “Rapture, English;” “Harpazo, Greek;” (Jn 14:1-3, 6; 1 Cor 15:50-54; 1 Thes 4:13-18) of the church has taken place. (2 Cor 5:10, Holman Christian Standard Bible. “For we must all appear before the tribunal of Christ (Judgment Seat Of Christ), so that each may be repaid for what he has done in the body, whether good or worthless.” HCSB Note (Kendell H. Easley, Ph. D.): This is a judgment to determine rewards, not eternal destination).
7. First Century Israel Rejects The Kingdom Offer. (Andrew M. Woods, Ph. D., The Coming Kingdom)
a. The Gospels carefully reveal Israel’s rejection of the Kingdom offer. The turning point is found in Mt 12:24. When the Pharisees were unable to explain away one of Yeshua’s many miracles, they instead attributed the miracle’s performance to Satanic powers. At this point, the expression, “Repent for the kingdom of heaven is hand” (Mt 3:2; 4:17; 10:5-7) virtually disappears from Matthew’s gospel. The concept does not resurface until the kingdom offer is re-extended to a distant generation of Jews during the future Tribulation period (Mt 24:14). Such an absence signifies that God took the kingdom “off the table” when the Pharisees demonstrated their unbelief when confronted by Christ’s miracles. This rejection was ratified at Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem, as well as by the nation’s decision to hand Christ over to the Romans for crucifixion (Mt 21-23; 26-27). Israel’s rejection of the kingdom offer is also represented in the following statement by the nation’s religious leaders to Pilate: “Pilate said to them, ‘Shall I crucify your King?’ The chief priests answered, ‘We have no king but Caesar’ ” (John 19:15). In the Parable of the Minas (Lk 19:11-27), “Israel’s rejection of the Lord is seen in the words of the citizenry, ‘We do not want this man to reign over us’ (Lk 19:14).” Consequently, John well summarizes the nation’s posture toward their own king: “He came to His own, and those who were His own did not receive Him” (John 1:11).
b. Matthew 12 is one of several passages in the Gospels on the contingency of the coming kingdom. Three times before Matt 12 the kingdom was said to be near (3:2; 4:17; 10:7). Then, after Jesus’s opponents accused Him of casting out demons by the power of Satan (12:24-32; Mk 3:22-30; Lk 11:14-26), the nearness of the kingdom is never mentioned again in the Gospels. Why was the kingdom said to be near, and then after Matt 12 was never again announced as being near in Jesus’s ministry?” The answer is that Israel rejected Jesus as the Messiah. This refusal to receive Him was true not only of the religious authorities, but also of the nation in general. The majority of the Lord’s miracles, demonstrations of His sovereignty, were performed in Galilee (11:20) and the people of Chorazin, Bethsaida, and Capernaum failed to repent (vs 21-24). This rejection was then climaxed by the opposition and blasphemy of the religious authorities (12:22-45). This does not mean that Christ stopped presenting Himself to Israel as their Messiah; He did this, particularly in His triumphal entry, but “the die had already been cast.” The kingdom was no longer near; Israel’s tragic decision had been made much earlier. Clearly, then, the coming of the kingdom was conditioned on Israel’s response to Jesus (Deu 17:15).
B. Unbelieving Pharisees Seek A Sign. 12:38-45.
1. Having been challenged to face the evidence that Yeshua was indeed what He claimed to be, the Pharisees, in their unbelief, asked for a spectacular sign. Christ answered them in an unsparing indictment. He declared, “An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas” (v. 39). He then recited the facts of the experience of Jonah, how he was three days and three nights in the great fish, and He described this as a prophetic incident, anticipating that the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. In other words, He was predicting His death and resurrection as the supreme sign for those seeking evidence of His claims. In the incident of Jonah, the men of Nineveh repented, even though they were unbelieving Gentiles. Here Jesus, who was far greater than Jonah, was before His own people, and they would not believe. (Note: Ryrie Study Bible, Charles C. Ryrie, Ph. D. “Three Days And Three Nights.” This phrase does not necessarily require that 72 hours elapse between Christ’s death and resurrection, for the Jews reckoned part of a day to be as a whole day. So, this prophecy can be properly fulfilled if the crucifixion occurred on Friday. However, the statement does require an historical Jonah who was actually swallowed by a great fish. (My note. The Ryrie Study Bible shows each day of Holy Week in Luke chapters 19:28-24:12).
2. Jesus cited another illustration of the queen of the south, who heard and believed in the wisdom of Solomon (1 Ki 10:1-13). Now a greater than Solomon was here, and the Jews would not believe. Again the illustration is of belief among the Gentiles which would emphasize the point He was making to the Pharisees.
3. In concluding His talk with the Pharisees, Yeshua pointed out the emptiness of religion without the supernatural power of God. In Matthew 12:43-45, He described the case of a man who, delivered of an unclean spirit or demon, proceeded to set his life in order religiously. His house, however, although swept and garnished, was empty. By this it is meant that the demons had left him and permitted some improvement in his religious life, but that he was far short of being born again and renewed by the Spirit of God. The reference to the evil spirit walking through “dry places” is based on the idea that the desert is the haunt of demons. The evil spirit, upon returning, brought seven other spirits and dwelt in the man, so that his last state was worse than his first. Jesus stated that, in like manner, the wicked generation of the Pharisees will experience the emptiness of their religion, which will lead to greater spiritual bondage.
C. Central Place Of True Discipleship. 12:46-50.
As Messiah was concluding His controversy with the Pharisees, word came to Him that His mother and brothers were outside and desired to speak to Him. Christ used the occasion to emphasize the need of discipleship above all earthly relationships. He dramatically asked, “Who is my mother? and who are my brethren?” Then, according to verse 49, “He stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, behold my mother and my brethren!” He went on, in the concluding verse of the chapter, to define a disciple as one who does the will of His Father in heaven. “The same,” Yeshua declared, “is my brother, and sister, and mother.” Coming at the conclusion of this chapter, it emphasizes the futility of mere religion or family relationships. Rather, the important issue was to be a disciple and to do the will of God. Although Messiah was at all times courteous to His mother, He never attributed to her any special qualities (cf. Jn 2:4). There is nothing in the Scripture to justify the exaltation of Mary to the role of a mediator between God and man.
Eternity 